web-locks-window-batch-update.tentative.https.sub.html

Enable keyboard shortcuts

This WPT test may be referenced by the following Test IDs:
- /shared-storage/web-locks-window-batch-update.tentative.https.sub.html - WPT Dashboard Interop Dashboard

<!doctype html>

<script src="/resources/testharness.js"></script>

<script src="/resources/testharnessreport.js"></script>

<script src="/common/utils.js"></script>

<script src="/shared-storage/resources/util.js"></script>

<script src="/fenced-frame/resources/utils.js"></script>

<body>

<script>

'use strict';

promise_test(async t => {

  let worklet = await sharedStorage.createWorklet('resources/simple-module.js');

  const ancestor_key = token();

  let url0 = generateURL("/shared-storage/resources/frame0.html",

                         [ancestor_key]);

  let url1 = generateURL("/shared-storage/resources/frame1.html",

                         [ancestor_key]);

  // Invoke `selectURL()` to perform the following steps:

  // 1. Acquires the lock.

  // 2. Reads the current value at the given key.

  // 3. Waits for 500ms.

  // 4. Sets the shared storage value to the read value appended with the given letter.

  // 5. Releases the lock.

//

  // After 100ms, invoke `sharedStorage.batchUpdate()` that:

  // - Acquires the same named lock.

  // - Executes two `append` methods, each appending the same letter.

//

  // Expected behavior: After both of them finish, the value at the given key

  // should contain the letter repeated three times.

//

  // This demonstrates that:

  // 1. The `withLock` option is effective, preventing the `batchUpdate()`

  //    method interfering with the "get and set" operation. If the lock were not

  //    used, the final value would likely be a single letter.

  // 2. `batchUpdate()` correctly executes all `append` methods within the

  //    batch.

//

  // Note: This test remains valid even if the `batchUpdate()` call happens

  // outside the critical section protected by the lock within the worklet. The

  // test effectively demonstrates mutual exclusion as long as there's a

  // reasonable chance for `batchUpdate()` to occur while the worklet is still

  // running.

  let select_url_result = await worklet.selectURL(

      "get-wait-set-within-lock",

      [{url: url0}, {url: url1}],

      {data: {'key': 'key',

              'lock_name': 'lock1',

              'append_letter': 'a'},

      resolveToConfig: true});

  // Busy wait for 100ms.

  const startWaitTime = Date.now();

  while (Date.now() - startWaitTime < 100) {}

  sharedStorage.batchUpdate([

      new SharedStorageAppendMethod('key', 'a'),

      new SharedStorageAppendMethod('key', 'a')

    ], {withLock: 'lock1'});

  attachFencedFrame(select_url_result, 'opaque-ads');

  const result = await nextValueFromServer(ancestor_key);

  assert_equals(result, "frame1_loaded");

  await verifyKeyValueForOrigin('key', 'aaa', location.origin);

  await deleteKeyForOrigin('key', location.origin);

}, 'Test for batchUpdate() with a batch lock in a Window context');

</script>

</body>